4 ms·
I like their API and the webadmin interface but I tried the 1.10 with node.js client (using the cpp protobuffer) and in my test it was slow compared to MySQL (I
by spyder 13y ago
I like their API and the webadmin interface but I tried the 1.10 with node.js client (using the cpp protobuffer) and in my test it was slow compared to MySQL (InnoDB). A simple select query with 100 items took around 70 ms while the same query was done in 3ms with MySQL. I'm not sure what did i do wrong or it is just in such an early stage. Also i cannot get versions above 1.10 from the repo on CentOS.
- fletchowns 13y agoIt's not trivial to do performance comparisons correctly, you'd have to provide a lot more detail about the tests to get proper feedback on it. Ideally the test would be something that anybody can download and run locally themselves. As far as the package repository for your distro not having the latest version of something, this is very very common. Your best bet is to build your own package from source, or find an alternate repository to use where somebody is building packages of the newer versions.
- coffeemug 13y agoLatency for range queries is a surprisingly tricky issue, there were a number of problems around it that we solved. Check out this issue for example -- https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/1766 https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/1766. Most of the problems have been resolved in 1.12, so we'd encourage you to give it a try again! As far as the outdated CentOS build -- I haven't heard of this problem before, but I'll check with @atnnn who's in charge of packaging -- see https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/2176 https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/2176. We'll get this resolved ASAP. EDIT: ok, @atnnn confirmed that 1.12 works on CentOS. If it doesn't for you, could you post more details on the GitHub issue? It would help immensely!