3 ms·
i dont like pop based backup options. i prefer doing an imap sync to local for which offlineimap has been doing an excellent job for me: http://software.comple
by spooneybarger 17y ago
i dont like pop based backup options. i prefer doing an imap sync to local for which offlineimap has been doing an excellent job for me:
http://software.complete.org/software/projects/show/offlineimap http://software.complete.org/software/projects/show/offlinei...
- jsonscripter 17y agoWhat are the specific advantages?
- spooneybarger 17y agoif i delete mail from gmail, it gets reflected in local copy. it has the negative, of if i lose everything from gmail and run a backup, it gets deleted from the local. but, i protect against that by having local backups. so my backups of local machine reflect the state of the gmail through time without growing and growing.
- vasi 17y agoSome other nice things: • Offlineimap uses maildir format, used by some IMAP servers like Dovecot. So if Google ever goes evil and locks you out, you can just use your own server instead. • Theoretically you can use Offlineimap to reproduce exactly all your mail and folders/labels onto another IMAP server. This would be pretty useful for migration, but I've never actually tried it.
- spooneybarger 17y agomaildir works very well with mutt as well and because of the 2 way sync nature of offlineimap, you can work offline with all of your mail ( something that the gmail offline doesn't allow me, it only makes some available. ). yes, i am a big offlineimap fan.