2 ms·
A gem: The better part of learning is making mistakes, and most grading penalizes mistakes. This is true; it makes students unadventurous. Fortunately, most s
by etal 17y ago
A gem:
The better part of learning is making mistakes, and most grading penalizes mistakes.
This is true; it makes students unadventurous. Fortunately, most science PhD programs already work nearly the way he's proposing:
- Students are attached to a lab early on, and mentored by a professor for the rest of the program
- Classes related to the degree usually allow enough flexibility in the assignments that a student can find a way to apply their lab's line of research to the current topic
- Students take 2-3 lecture-style courses and a scattering of seminars each semester for the first two years or so, then focus entirely on research (mentored, of course) for the rest of the program
- Grades are implicitly just a formality. Maybe not everyone figures this out, but you're doing things properly in science course, you will get an A. Don't even worry about it; just focus on your research and let the prof know you're learning something. In a PhD program, your report card is really your list of publications -- and that's another can of worms.
The biggest departures from this I see are in law, business and med schools, where there's a secondary goal of filtering students up front. (And they charge so much for the honor. Science grad school isn't so much a hefty up-front investment as a temporary oath of poverty.)
My program is a mix of CS, math/stats and biology, and it's interesting to see how the disciplines collide in the curriculum committee. CS and math/stats teachers do have a lot of material that simply must be lectured to students, with lots of targeted exercises along the way -- these professors push for more core courses. Science teachers constantly try to trim the core requirements so students can spend more time in the lab, doing real research, without distractions. I don't think this dynamic would have evolved if the department was simply following the rote lecture-and-exam tradition.
- bkovitz 17y agoThis is quite a good observation: something reasonably close to apprenticeship is already in place. Grad students are given enormous flexibility in their assignments—a little trick to buy them time to try out their own research ideas long before they get to the thesis. Grading is extremely lenient; it's just a formality to keep things within reason. Professors are always eager to help you work on something publishable.