4 ms·
Conditional on having an illegal policy, enforcing said policy in an effective manner similar to your enforcement of other (legal) policies should not earn you
by simon_ 13y ago
Conditional on having an illegal policy, enforcing said policy in an effective manner similar to your enforcement of other (legal) policies should not earn you extra condemnation.
- hahainternet 13y ago> Conditional on having an illegal policy, enforcing said policy in an effective manner similar to your enforcement of other (legal) policies should not earn you extra condemnation. Why not?
- infinity0 13y agoExpressing outrage at extraneous facts surrounding a widespread unethical conspiracy to screw workers, should not earn you a pretentious lecture about compartmentalising your emotions.
- hkphooey 13y agoSpeaking of conspiracy... Anybody else looked at AngelList and the salaries being offered? Isn't it strange that the majority of salaries, cash and equity, top out at the same amount? Isn't it amazing that in a free market, hundreds of start-up founders value engineers the same? Smells like something fishy going at the angel funds and VCs to price fix wages of start-up worker bees...
- philwelch 13y agoFree markets tend to balance out at an equilibrium price.
- Jare 13y agoSounds a bit like saying "Conditional on being a thief, behaving like a douche should not earn you extra condemnation". Some of the executives seem professional and that's ok, but others seem to take things rather personally, with all the marks of an ego trip.
- forgotAgain 13y agoConditional on having an illegal policy, enforcing said policy in an effective manner similar to your enforcement of other (legal) policies should not earn you extra condemnation. Sure it should. You should not be enforcing the policy, you should be denouncing it.