I saw it, read it, and upvoted it because I found the history described in the article to be interesting, slightly charming, and entertaining to read. (The par

I saw it, read it, and upvoted it because I found the history described in the article to be interesting, slightly charming, and entertaining to read. (The part about the current printer market isn't very surprising or interesting, though. Ironically, that's what the title's about. Perhaps it'd be better titled "Apple's history with printers".) I suppose that doesn't explain how it got to the front page, but maybe explains why it's still there.