3 ms·
Although I don't agree with you about their motives (wrt just trying to look superior to their peers), I won't argue that point. But even if you think their mo
by dustyleary 13y ago
Although I don't agree with you about their motives (wrt just trying to look superior to their peers), I won't argue that point.
But even if you think their motives behind the charity are selfish, don't discount the effects.
How many Einsteins, von Neumans, Ramanujans, or Musks (pick your genius of choice, really) are stillborn in the developing world because of malaria or HIV? How many never achieve their potential because of malnutrition or polio?
If the Gates Foundation eradicates malaria and polio, and we get a few more world-changing geniuses out of it, they'll have done much more to push the technological envelope than any other endeavor.
- MrScruff 13y agoI'm not going to argue that eradicating malaria is a bad thing, but it's inaccurate to infer that the only thing preventing the worlds extreme poor from being leaders of industry is good health.