4 ms·

http://things.gnod.com/flashdrives/#y=gb http://things.gnod.com/flashdrives/#y=gb

• Tloewald 13y ago
  Yes, this is much more useful as it doesn't require multiplying every coordinate in your head. It's still kind of broken though. How about actually plotting the drives at their correct position rather than stacking them neatly? Capacity vs. Price seems perfectly reasonable. The PNY 128GB drive which is at the top of the original linked graph is nestled between two other drives -- one smaller and pricier per dollar, the other the same size and pricier per dollar.
  • no_gravity 13y ago
    "How about actually plotting the drives at their correct position rather than stacking them neatly?" It would be one big mess of overlapping stuff. I can code an option for that if there is demand for it.
    • Tloewald 13y ago
      Yes it would have that problem, but it would have the advantage of conveying useful information. How about plotting smaller points and providing the image and info on rollover -- the tiny icons don't serve much purpose. Differentiating USB3 vs. USB2 would probably be informative too.
      • twic 13y ago
        Whilst such a graph would certainly have the advantage of displaying the data accurately, do bear in mind that it would have the disadvantage of not looking like a partridge.
    • largote 13y ago
      YES, that would help as currently you can see 256GB drives beneath 64GB ones in the capacity axis (which is terrible).
• largote 13y ago
  This is way more useful.