3 ms·
Of course not, and that was not my point. The original comment said that because DDoS could be illegal, is was different from openly carrying a fire-arm; that
by bertil 13y ago
Of course not, and that was not my point.
The original comment said that because DDoS could be illegal, is was different from openly carrying a fire-arm; that assumes that openly carrying a firearm isn’t illegal. It often is, outside of the US -- hence my response.
I would have appreciated you didn’t downvote me before you understood that.
- mpyne 13y agoFair enough, but the comment you had replied to had assumed quite reasonably that DDoS is a criminal act, and I can only assume your response quibbling about that was $SOMETHING-centric. Apologies for the downvote but that impression changed my interpretation of your later comment.