3 ms·

As soon as I realised that Maps were the only feature of a smartphone that I valued positively, I went back to carrying a dumbphone and a map. Battery life tru

by ronaldx 13y ago

As soon as I realised that Maps were the only feature of a smartphone that I valued positively, I went back to carrying a dumbphone and a map. Battery life trumps navigation, for me, comfortably. If I'm lost after a long day, I need the option to phone my destination.

nilkn 13y ago
For what it's worth, if battery life is important, my Note 3--about as far as you can get from a dumbphone--has amazing battery life. The battery meter barely goes down after an entire day. I occasionally don't charge it for two days and it's still green and going strong. It's literally never died on me. And I don't do anything particularly to keep the battery life up, like reducing screen brightness.
- ronaldx 13y ago
  Good battery life, but online testing suggests that it will die before day's end if you use it for internet browsing. For comparison, I occasionally don't charge my phone for two weeks. Edit: apologies for editing :)
  - nilkn 13y ago
    > Good, but other tests say it dies after 9 hours of browsing. I wouldn't really know, because never have I been in a situation where I actually used my phone nonstop for 9 hours. =] For my typical usage, the battery will last several days at least and probably a bit more if I put more effort into reducing battery consumption. I actually don't know how long it'll last since it's never died. Definitely not two weeks, but long enough for me to not really worry about the battery life. All that said, I can definitely see the appeal of a phone that lasts two weeks. I think the Note 3 sits at a decent compromise between that and my old phone, a Galaxy S3, which could barely last 8 hours (of typical, very intermittent usage).
- zxexz 13y ago
  I bet it still doesn't beat my Nokia C139 :P
- glomph 13y ago
  Still basically nothing when compared with dumbphones which can last weeks.
JeremyNT 13y ago
Regarding battery life, I'd be curious to know how a modern smart phone would fare if you used it as infrequently as a dumbphone. When truly idle my nexus 5 seems to drain very little; it's the fact that it's so useful (and in turn so frequently used) that seems to be the issue here.
- ronaldx 13y ago
  I understand why you say this, but I think this is not exactly the issue. I do carry an internet-capable device, whenever I might need one (i.e. less often than you would think). If I were to carry a smartphone for this purpose then I would get a worse experience than I do on a larger screen, and it would hinder my ability to use telephony services when I need them. For my needs, those services do not belong in one device.

by ronaldx 13y ago

nilkn 13y ago

For what it's worth, if battery life is important, my Note 3--about as far as you can get from a dumbphone--has amazing battery life. The battery meter barely goes down after an entire day. I occasionally don't charge it for two days and it's still green and going strong. It's literally never died on me. And I don't do anything particularly to keep the battery life up, like reducing screen brightness.

ronaldx 13y ago
Good battery life, but online testing suggests that it will die before day's end if you use it for internet browsing. For comparison, I occasionally don't charge my phone for two weeks. Edit: apologies for editing :)
- nilkn 13y ago
  > Good, but other tests say it dies after 9 hours of browsing. I wouldn't really know, because never have I been in a situation where I actually used my phone nonstop for 9 hours. =] For my typical usage, the battery will last several days at least and probably a bit more if I put more effort into reducing battery consumption. I actually don't know how long it'll last since it's never died. Definitely not two weeks, but long enough for me to not really worry about the battery life. All that said, I can definitely see the appeal of a phone that lasts two weeks. I think the Note 3 sits at a decent compromise between that and my old phone, a Galaxy S3, which could barely last 8 hours (of typical, very intermittent usage).
zxexz 13y ago
I bet it still doesn't beat my Nokia C139 :P
glomph 13y ago
Still basically nothing when compared with dumbphones which can last weeks.

JeremyNT 13y ago

Regarding battery life, I'd be curious to know how a modern smart phone would fare if you used it as infrequently as a dumbphone. When truly idle my nexus 5 seems to drain very little; it's the fact that it's so useful (and in turn so frequently used) that seems to be the issue here.

ronaldx 13y ago
I understand why you say this, but I think this is not exactly the issue. I do carry an internet-capable device, whenever I might need one (i.e. less often than you would think). If I were to carry a smartphone for this purpose then I would get a worse experience than I do on a larger screen, and it would hinder my ability to use telephony services when I need them. For my needs, those services do not belong in one device.