3 ms·
> That's a very very very VERY unprofessional stance. I do not recognise this definition of professionalism, and am happy to be called unprofessional if it is
by urbanautomaton 13y ago
> That's a very very very VERY unprofessional stance.
I do not recognise this definition of professionalism, and am happy to be called unprofessional if it is the accepted one.
Mozilla is an organisation that is dependent on community goodwill and support, and if the person they choose as a figurehead is one who has taken direct action to alienate a large segment of that community, then it seems to me entirely proper for that community to react as they see fit.
- DatBear 13y agoNot sure how this is a direct action taken to alienate a community. Seems like they're alienating themselves just fine.
- urbanautomaton 13y agoWell, let me help you out. Brendan Eich choosing to pay actual money (taking a direct action) to oppose the existence of gay marriage (alienating a large community) is what I'm referring to.
- m0skit0 13y agoYou said it: Brendan Eich. In his free time. As an individual person. Mozilla has nothing to do with what this guy does in his free time (and I hope it doesn't).
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- m0skit0 13y agoOf course everyone can react as he/she sees fit. I did.