4 ms·
It's often stated that there is some kind of deep contradiction between quantum theory and relativity, so in an effort to add a comment here, I went off to goog
by ttctciyf 13y ago
It's often stated that there is some kind of deep contradiction between quantum theory and relativity, so in an effort to add a comment here, I went off to google that, and found this: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/387/a-list-of-inconveniences-between-quantum-mechanics-and-general-relativity http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/387/a-list-of-inc... where there's a pretty comprehensive treatment of the question, from which I'm not even qualified to reliably pull a quote.
In general, though, since reality is usually assumed to be consistent, at least for purposes of doing physics, any set physical theories which have mutually inconsistent consequences wouldn't normally be elevated to the status of "laws" since the immediate implication would be that one or more of them must be erroneous, right?
- sillysaurus3 13y agoIt's an interesting question whether to ask about "laws" or "theories" in this context, because if I ask about "theories inconsistent with one another" then there are probably hundreds of answers, but none of them are interesting because most theories are wrong. I was hoping to find examples of theories that are (a) popular, (b) haven't been proven wrong for at least several years. If there are contradictions between those and other, more established laws, then that's interesting. I was hoping this submission might attract at least one upvote so that it appears on the 'ask' page and some of HN's fine physicists might see it.