4 ms·
Of course not, but then again I don't consider intentional physical harm & objections to marriage even remotely comparable situations. Latent effects of refusi
by sehr 13y ago
Of course not, but then again I don't consider intentional physical harm & objections to marriage even remotely comparable situations.
Latent effects of refusing marriage like lack of insurance coverage leading to preventable deaths would be a much better match though. And to that, I still believe conversation is a better tool than outright condemnation & intolerance.
- wpietri 13y agoNo idea where "intentional physical harm" came from, but it wasn't me. Preventing a family from getting married is harm. It is at the very least expensive in time and money. But it also puts children at substantial risk. See the recent decision on the Michigan Marriage Amendment for more on that: http://www.freep.com/assets/freep/pdf/C4220110321.PDF http://www.freep.com/assets/freep/pdf/C4220110321.PDF
- sehr 13y agoSorry, I took 'harming you' as meaning physical harm, that's my mistake.