4 ms·
Because rendering a table is almost always slower. Granted, this is an old benchmark (don't have time to pull up any that are more recent), but: http://www.howt
by warfangle 17y ago
Because rendering a table is almost always slower. Granted, this is an old benchmark (don't have time to pull up any that are more recent), but: http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
- blakeperdue 17y agoSometimes a small rendering performance hit is worth avoiding the development headache of getting multi-column divs to display properly across browsers. Tables can still be useful when holding short content that has lots of columns.
- deno 17y agoIn the world without Internet Explorer all you need is CSS3 column-count: N; property. Still, using tables for any kind of formatting looks just plain bad. If you're lazy there are CSS frameworks.