3 ms·
Yes, and I think that bias is (quasi-)ageism. I'm certainly not saying that someone who has held multiple positions has not stagnated, either, simply that fund
by vonmoltke 13y ago
Yes, and I think that bias is (quasi-)ageism.
I'm certainly not saying that someone who has held multiple positions has not stagnated, either, simply that fundamentally the only difference between me and someone who worked for three different companies but had the same roles as I did is merely the company nameplate. To make different assumptions based solely on that is illogical.
- fecak 13y agoIt's quasi-ageism, I guess, in that junior level workers are difficult to accuse of stagnation. So although junior level workers may stagnate, it may be assumed that they didn't yet. I've seen devs in their early 30s as victims of this stagnation assumption (10 years in some traditional industry).