4 ms·
Do you believe in miracles?
- jacquesm 17y agoI find the reasoning around Jesus not having a human father to counteract Dawkins very much stretched. Dawkins wasn't arguing from what is possible today, he was arguing from what was possible 2000+ years ago, and as far as we know today human cloning wasn't on the table then. (and it hasn't been positively established that it is even on the table today!).
- jamesbritt 17y ago". I have already argued that Hume's definition of miracles violates the principles of logic rather those of science." The argument is mere question begging. He claims that miracles do not violate the laws of physics because, he claims, laws of physics cover miracles too.