3 ms·
And as we know a lot of it has been blown out of proportions thanks to the potent mix of random "twats" and overeager traditional media. As a tool it has its u
by nick-dap 17y ago
And as we know a lot of it has been blown out of proportions thanks to the potent mix of random "twats" and overeager traditional media.
As a tool it has its uses. However, I strongly believe that 45 million people don't _need_ this as a tool and use it purely for enterntainment. To say that we rely on Twitter for communication is simply false.
- axod 17y agoAlso the 45m figure probably means 45m people have created an account at some point, tried it, thought it was ridiculous, and stopped using it. Daily users is probably far lower.
- voom 17y agoI was banned for using the word "twat" (modded down mercilessly even after I posted the full definition because I wasn't sufficiently humble about it). Look up the account, sharkfish. http://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=sharkfish http://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=sharkfish What is wrong with you people. Can't you see this poster is ruining the forum!?!? </sarcasm>
- joubert 17y agoI would argue it is for the market to decide what people need.