4 ms·
The reference to "sued" leads the conversation astray. Substitute "prosecuted" for "sued" to see the full spectrum of ignorance here. Conspiring with a competit
by warmfuzzykitten 13y ago
The reference to "sued" leads the conversation astray. Substitute "prosecuted" for "sued" to see the full spectrum of ignorance here. Conspiring with a competitor to fix costs may be deemed a "contract in restraint of trade" under the Sherman Act. The CEO of a company should know this at some fundamental level, under the category of "things that could send me to jail". Yes, most anti-trust violations are settled with fines and only companies are fined, but violations are a felony and can result in individual fines of up to $1 million (written back when this was a lot of money) and, more significantly for Eric Schmidt, in jail terms of up to 10 years.
- ChuckMcM 13y agoWell in this particular case Google and the rest have already been prosecuted and fined for the criminal misconduct. The criminal case was settled in 2010, this particular story is really about the on-going civil litigation where Google is named as a defendant in a class action suit. Some of the defendants have already settled.