I wasn't arguing that its legal. I merely argued that there's nothing immoral about it. No rights to do anything are being violated. People are just agreeing

I wasn't arguing that its legal. I merely argued that there's nothing immoral about it. No rights to do anything are being violated. People are just agreeing to not exercise their rights. And rights are not duties. We can exercise them or not. Just because people are wildly successfully and in charge doesn't take away their basic rights, even if you don't like the outcome. Everybody is still free to work with whoever will agree to work with them. There is no right to coerce others to do what we would prefer.