4 ms·
Have any of the managers/developers been confronted on their complacency, and if not, why? Sadly, you can't just fire someone without first giving them a chance
by DigitalSea 13y ago
Have any of the managers/developers been confronted on their complacency, and if not, why? Sadly, you can't just fire someone without first giving them a chance to turn things around. Nothing motivates better than fear, but it can also cause people to become resentful towards the company.
You need to pull each employee aside, especially the manager(s) who should be ensuring efficiency is kept at acceptable levels. This sounds like a double-edged problem. Employees not realising they're dropping in efficiency and managers not noticing the drop in performance and also failing to do anything about it if they have noticed. Sounds very much like a safety in numbers scenario at the moment.
All you need to say is, "Hey, we've noticed you're not performing as well as you have in the past. Is there a problem we are not aware about, is there anything preventing you from doing your job properly? Lack of resources, lack of proper tools, personal issues? Are you being asked to do too much, is the work too difficult and is there anything we can do better to make it easier for you to do your job?" but at no point should you start pointing fingers and placing blame upon people. Talk to your employees like you would your best friend, only more professionally.
Free food and a great environment shouldn't be the only motivators the company offers by the way. It's like those code hackathons that offer free pizza, beer and cans of Red Bull, just because you're giving away free stuff, doesn't mean you are entitled to overwork or unreasonably expect more from your employees or those around you. If the work isn't stimulating or challenging people will grow bored as well, there is usually more than one answer to a problem. Are unreasonable time frames and expectations being placed upon your employees? If you're asking for things to be done within 2 weeks, but it should be a 3 week job, who is to blame? The business imposing unreasonable time frames or the employees who have to try and get the work done within said time frame?
The fact you're saying it's a twelve person team and it's the whole team to me signals it is a management problem. Solve the problem at the top and you'll most likely notice the trickle down effects to the rest of the team.
- cjbprime 13y agoI agree with almost everything you said, but: > Nothing motivates better than fear Seriously?
- DigitalSea 13y agoIf you confront someone who is deliberately not doing their job correctly and it is their fault, the fear of losing your job is greater than all in my opinion. If you're knowingly slacking off, maybe fear is what you need. I don't agree that fear is an excellent motivator in all situations, but in some situations it is warranted. It is no different than receiving a legal letter asking for payment because it is 2 months overdue. The legal letter is a fearful reminder you need to pay and it's sad that some situations call for fear tactics, but sometimes you need to understand it is how things go.
- lancewiggs 13y agoFear can be a motivator, but it can also backfire. The motivation may be to wok harder, but also to leave, seek legal redress or become even more demotivated.
- RollAHardSix 13y agoThe problem is in the workplace environment, where one's own personal liability and livelihood is at stake, fear will only serve as a reason to find a new position. Personally if I was involved in any type of one on one like you mentioned, I would go home and start putting out resume's that day. You just can't take the chance of being fired later on, plenty of companies will use the 'you're not performing' bit to motivate employees to work themselves far beyond what they should be working even on a regular schedule.