4 ms·
Um, it says right there in the headline that Sergey was complicit in this too.
by asdfologist 13y ago
Um, it says right there in the headline that Sergey was complicit in this too.
- yuhong 13y agoRead the article in more detail.
- asdfologist 13y agoUm, perhaps you should? The article makes no inference that Schmidt had a bigger role. In fact, the article mentions Brin more often than Schmidt.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- yuhong 13y ago"Brin appears to not know what the nature of the agreement is between the two companies." I actually started another thread discussing this exact topic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7455116 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7455116
- asdfologist 13y agoI don't see your point. Ok, so Jobs talked to Schmidt before talking to Brin. Either way, Brin continued the practice and actively promoted it.
- meowface 13y agoNot who you replied to, but: Brin seemed pretty complicit in it. He didn't make the final decision to appease Jobs, but he asked for a temporary stay in recruiting Apple employees and obviously agreed with Schmidt's decision to ban all recruiting.
- lexisuseless 13y agoI wasn't ranking them on the evilness axis. Just smartness.