4 ms·
Show HN: Gmail's now 10, recover all the old photos buried in your mails
- RainforestCx 13y agoSo awesome, thank you! Would love to be able to use something similar to search for and/or give some meta-label-tag to emails that have embedded images too. Will look into it and give it a shot. Thanks again!
- caio1982 13y agoI'm glad that you found it useful! Don't forget it's open source, give the tagging feature a try and send a pull request :-)
- gkoberger 13y agoFor those of you afraid of the command line, this is based on LostPhotos (Windows/OSX) http://lostphotosapp.com/ http://lostphotosapp.com/, which costs money (boo) but has a really nice interface (yay).
- pazimzadeh 13y agoIt looks like it's free, at least for OS X. Edit: It's only free for the first 100 photos.
- ivanca 13y ago"LostPhotosSetup-IM-1.1.exe is malicious, and Chrome has blocked it." on latest Chrome (33.0.1750.154 m) W7-64
- WasimBhai 13y agoNot working with two factor authentication.
- nacs 13y agoYou can make one time use keys at Google if you have TFA turned on.
- Osmium 13y agoJust bought the Mac version of this app (happy to support the dev), but a few comments: Would be nice to have some basic filters, e.g. restrict based on sender/recipient. It hasn't finished searching my mail yet, but if it turns out it names the photos based on the recipient etc. then I can just filter them myself... Also, the app doesn't have retina buttons. For most things this would be okay, but even the close/minimise/zoom window controls are pixelated! It's a shame to have a photo-centric app look so poorly, especially when default controls would have fixed that. Edit: Also, the zoom doesn't do anything! But it's not greyed out, so suggests that it does. I actually like the interface, and have nothing against skeuomorphism per se, but it's not cool when it breaks things... Finally, a comment on heuristics: it was really cool to see the restrictions on small file size images and gifs, because that removes a load of emoticons, advertising etc. that otherwise would've added clutter. But additional heuristics would be nice, e.g. it's found some images that are not photos for me. I imagine a simple test would be just counting the number of unique colours present in the image (though I don't know how slow that would be): a lot of the images coming up that aren't photos often have a few dozen colours max. Otherwise very happy to have bought it :) Certainly saves me time doing it all myself by manually syncing everything with some mail client and then searching the attachments folder...