4 ms·
I've done that with hardware that got installed in a factory. Why not? You pay a one-time, small license fee, you get years of free support from a major compa
by RogerL 13y ago
I've done that with hardware that got installed in a factory.
Why not? You pay a one-time, small license fee, you get years of free support from a major company, I don't have to document all the details of my stripped down kernel and how to recreate it, you can hire anybody off the street to work on it long after I am gone (and I am long gone from that company, but the hardware lives on), they didn't have to pay me to build out a unique OS, the low power computer we had could more than handle XP, there was (and continues to be) continued new, unknown requirements and upgrades, the people required to occasionally touch the interface had more PC experience than for any embedded or linux OS, and on and on.
Why wouldn't I slap a copy of XP on there? Well, this story is the counter-argument, of course. I still think it was the right decision.
- _greim_ 13y agoThey took the path of least resistance and it paid off until now. Now that path is a dead end and they face a painful upgrade. But arguably it was still worth it in the long run.
- ChuckMcM 13y agoThis seems the most salient point. At some point someone said "What if XP isn't supported?" and someone else said "Well we'll deal with that when it comes, but for now we've got a product to ship."