A big takeaway is in the second point: >By publishing yesterday’s Huawei story, the NYT obviously made the editorial judgment that these revelations are both n

A big takeaway is in the second point: >By publishing yesterday’s Huawei story, the NYT obviously made the editorial judgment that these revelations are both newsworthy and in the public interest, should be disclosed, and will not unduly harm “American national security.” For reasons I explain below, I agree with that choice. >But if you disagree – if you want to argue that this NSA story is reckless, dangerous, treasonous or whatever – then have the courage to take it up with the people who reached the opposite conclusion: in this case, the editors and reporters of the NYT (indeed, as former DOJ official Jack Goldsmith observed[1], the NYT‘s Huawei story was “based on leaks other than the Snowden documents”). [1] http://www.lawfareblog.com/2014/03/the-nyt-on-nsas-huawei-penetration/ http://www.lawfareblog.com/2014/03/the-nyt-on-nsas-huawei-pe...