3 ms·
My view is that in any place where public transportation is not ubiquitous, the ridership often comprises the poorest people in the city. Much of the public tr
by cyclecount 13y ago
My view is that in any place where public transportation is not ubiquitous, the ridership often comprises the poorest people in the city. Much of the public transportation system is used only by those who cannot afford better means of transportation. In NY, the norm is that everyone from the poorest classes to the upper-middle class use the Subway and buses for their daily commute, to go out at night, to grocery shop, to visit friends. The Subway is utilized by people from all backgrounds.
In SF, the buses are dirty and filled with homeless and mentally ill people. Taking a bus home late at night is the plight of the commoners, the poorest class that work in the service industry and can't afford an Uber or taxi. And this class divide is why a BART strike is possible. The worst affected were those who didn't have a car too fall back on, or who couldn't work from home for a few days.
If something so critical as the NYC Subway stops functioning for more than a few hours, the MTA provides alternative buses and advance notice. A multi-day complete system outage would impact everyone, not just the poorest people unfortunate enough not to have other options.
- ZanyProgrammer 13y agoIn my experience, the rush hour commute on BART takes quite a bit of white collar people to/from the Market Street stops. Its just that when the BART strikes happened, a lot of people could work from home or drive or whatever. Imagine being a full time student at SFSU or something coming in from the East Bay.