16 ms·
Given that we have no distribution system in place, it is true that if the state redistributes money, that is a more efficient way to go. However, you slightly
by tomphoolery 13y ago
Given that we have no distribution system in place, it is true that if the state redistributes money, that is a more efficient way to go. However, you slightly missed my point. I'm not talking about a system that gives you vouchers. I'm talking about a system that gives you FOOD. This isn't food stamps, this is a system that lives outside of the economy. You don't pay for food, you don't have a "quota". Everything is centralized. Basically, this removes the need for brick and mortar grocery stores, and ends our dependence on large companies like Wal-Mart, et. al., to sell us our food.
We shouldn't need to buy food. That's the point.