3 ms·
Oh, for unjustified expenses? I pass those as personal expenses, and get they out of my corporate accounts. Sounds tight, but Denmark has a history of corporat
by bertil 13y ago
Oh, for unjustified expenses? I pass those as personal expenses, and get they out of my corporate accounts.
Sounds tight, but Denmark has a history of corporate corruption in the 70-80s they are trying to curb.
More importantly, not sure how that is related to individual benefits; on the contrary: seems like they are focusing on tax dodging.
- contingencies 13y agoIt's related because if the price you pay for fuzzy utopian governance with near-total compliance is totalitarianism, it's not worth it. Further, if you're setting up paralegal business flows in corporations to avoid personal tracking, then it's but an illustration of the same.
- bertil 13y agoIt sounds like we agree to disagree.