4 ms·

Why not host the site on S3?

• bananas 13y ago
  Because I've had literally piles of trouble with AWS over the years. Edit: plus I might need to add some dynamic content...
  • ejdyksen 13y ago
    Dynamic content can be done pretty well with just JavaScript, depending on what your needs are. As for trouble you've had with AWS, I'd encourage you to take a second look at S3 specifically. It's been pretty bulletproof for a long time now.
    • bananas 13y ago
      That's not dynamic content. It's not. A company I worked for recently had a 2TiB S3 deployment for archiving insurance documents and the amount of hoops you gave to go through for it to be reliable is incredible (no uploads or downloads are guaranteed and sometimes randomly fail for a while).