3 ms·

I disagree. Having this person criminally charged for violating a civil contract (the non-disclosure contract with his now-former employer) is a bad idea. The

I disagree. Having this person criminally charged for violating a civil contract (the non-disclosure contract with his now-former employer) is a bad idea. The FBI, or even the City of Redmond Police Department, will require that there be at least the probability of a crime having been committed before they'll go in front of a judge.

mirkules 13y ago
However, "the complaint alleges that Kibkalo committed criminal trade secret theft", keyword being "criminal". I believe the crime in question is the following federal crime: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2011-title18/USCODE-2011-title18-partI-chap90-sec1832/content-detail.html http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2011-title18/USCODE-... Whether or not we agree with the law is a separate matter from whether or not a crime was committed -- which they had reasonable suspicion to believe it was. Therefore, they should have gone in front of a judge for a warrant.