2 ms·
If purging (substantial and interesting) one-to-one conversation is an intended effect I think that'd be a shame.
by mcintyre1994 13y ago
If purging (substantial and interesting) one-to-one conversation is an intended effect I think that'd be a shame.
- pg 13y agoNo, that's not intended. If it happens we'll fix it.
- 001sky 13y agoThis would be great to keep an eye on. eg: Two commenters X,Y with sub-threshold karma (<1,000) could never have a dialogue (two-way, real-time) as a third party Z would need to endorse their each and every comment. Two commenters X,Y (Karma 1,000+ each) in substantially different timezones with a-synchronous dialogue (eg, overnight replies) would need a third party z to endorse each and every comment (at least until the other wakes up). Two commenters X,Y (Karma 1,000+ each) with opposing views, could never have a real-time dialogue without a third party z to endorse each and every comment (unless #) Hopefully these are at least helpful to dilineate. # "Thank you sir, can I have another".