5 ms·

They have the right because it's their service. No one is forcing you or anyone else to use their email service. If you don't like it, you're free to move to an

They have the right because it's their service. No one is forcing you or anyone else to use their email service. If you don't like it, you're free to move to another email service. Or better yet, do what I did and just have it go straight to your own domains email.

lugg 13y ago
I'm sorry but I still have a right to privacy no matter whom the service belongs to. Companies cannot overturn my rights simply because they own the service. They are a carrier whether they like it or not and have to adhere to certain standards at the very least on social responsibility grounds. I find the old companies can do what they want just use someone else fallacy very tired. I can't simply change my email address that is something easier said than done. This isn't myspace were talking about or some dating service. This is my online identity and more and more my real life one at that.
- leephillips 13y ago
  "have to adhere to certain standards" Google already deliberately violates[0] the RFPs defining the expected behavior of their SMTP server by rewriting your headers when they want to. If they feel entitled to change your outgoing email messages, the other stuff shouldn't be too surprising. [0]http://lee-phillips.org/gmailRewriting/ http://lee-phillips.org/gmailRewriting/
  - lugg 13y ago
    Honestly I dont trust google in the slightest. They probably have more I formation on me and my peers than any other entity in the world. I'm not saying they are utterly untrustworthy or inherently evil, I simply dont just don't trust anyone that much. Regarding being surprised, I'm not.
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
wpietri 13y ago
If there is a sadder moral standard than "might makes right", I am unable to bring it to mind.
- praxulus 13y ago
  Your statement is correct, but not relevant. Even if they had total market dominance, it would be a stretch to compare them to somebody using physical violence, and they certainly don't go out of their way to lock you into using gmail (compared to Yahoo, for instance, who didn't let me set up email forwarding without upgrading to a paid account).
  - wpietri 13y ago
    Physical violence isn't the only form of might. "Might" is a synonym for power. And ownership, which is what squintychino claims justifies their actions, is certainly a form of power.
    - lugg 13y ago
      For what its worth I understood.

lugg 13y ago

I'm sorry but I still have a right to privacy no matter whom the service belongs to. Companies cannot overturn my rights simply because they own the service. They are a carrier whether they like it or not and have to adhere to certain standards at the very least on social responsibility grounds. I find the old companies can do what they want just use someone else fallacy very tired. I can't simply change my email address that is something easier said than done. This isn't myspace were talking about or some dating service. This is my online identity and more and more my real life one at that.

leephillips 13y ago
"have to adhere to certain standards" Google already deliberately violates[0] the RFPs defining the expected behavior of their SMTP server by rewriting your headers when they want to. If they feel entitled to change your outgoing email messages, the other stuff shouldn't be too surprising. [0]http://lee-phillips.org/gmailRewriting/ http://lee-phillips.org/gmailRewriting/
- lugg 13y ago
  Honestly I dont trust google in the slightest. They probably have more I formation on me and my peers than any other entity in the world. I'm not saying they are utterly untrustworthy or inherently evil, I simply dont just don't trust anyone that much. Regarding being surprised, I'm not.

deleted 13y ago

[deleted]

wpietri 13y ago

If there is a sadder moral standard than "might makes right", I am unable to bring it to mind.

praxulus 13y ago
Your statement is correct, but not relevant. Even if they had total market dominance, it would be a stretch to compare them to somebody using physical violence, and they certainly don't go out of their way to lock you into using gmail (compared to Yahoo, for instance, who didn't let me set up email forwarding without upgrading to a paid account).
- wpietri 13y ago
  Physical violence isn't the only form of might. "Might" is a synonym for power. And ownership, which is what squintychino claims justifies their actions, is certainly a form of power.
  - lugg 13y ago
    For what its worth I understood.