4 ms·

Or, you know, his source lied?

• corresation 13y ago
  Alternately, he is lying. It sounds crass to outright say such a thing, but it is suspiciously convenient that Arrington draws attention to himself under the pretext of having explosive information relating to a current hot story, all with mysterious unnamed sources.
  • tptacek 13y ago
    It's especially amusing given how he ends the article. "I'd have said this before, but it would have hurt my bottom line, because it would have more fully informed sources of the risks they were taking."
  • nikcub 13y ago
    If it means anything, a lot of people internally at Techcrunch knew about this incident as well - as did a few people outside. It's just being made public now.