4 ms·
Why is that worrying? I don't read into that an implication that linux 2.6 is insecure, just the terribly vulnerable versions they were using.
by duaneb 13y ago
Why is that worrying? I don't read into that an implication that linux 2.6 is insecure, just the terribly vulnerable versions they were using.
- mpyne 13y agoThe problem is that if you simply say that, something like "2.6.9 is vulnerable", it might not actually be true. Enterprise Linux vendors might actually be running 2.6.9 but with relevant security patches backported.
- keithpeter 13y agoWhen it get read out of context by phbs.