4 ms·
> just as shop floor assistant and a corporate VP who both had equal holdings in the relevant company's stock on things that go to votes of the shareholders. T
by voicereasonish 13y ago
> just as shop floor assistant and a corporate VP who both had equal holdings in the relevant company's stock on things that go to votes of the shareholders.
That's the point - in that logic, the amount of votes you get in a democracy would be tied to how much land you own. Which IMHO seems a probably better way to do things.
- dragonwriter 13y ago> That's the point - in that logic, the amount of votes you get in a democracy would be tied to how much land you own. No, land is something you own subordinate to the nation, not an equity stake in the nation. Though the idea that the problem with our government is that its not plutocratic enough is, well, amusing.