Imagine a solitary actor in a large corporation who is make a choice between x and y. She is presented with the precise set of inputs like emails, voice calls,

Imagine a solitary actor in a large corporation who is make a choice between x and y. She is presented with the precise set of inputs like emails, voice calls, water cooler discussions which lead her to choose y. She is not forced to make the decision, but it comes naturally, quickly. Now imagine the result of that decision y being fed back into the corporate decision making structure. Thousands of people all "naturally" coming to their respective conclusions y', y'', y''', ... etc. This is corporate culture and history. Now imagine some external driver of change appears on the horizon. How will the company respond? How will individuals within that company respond? I don't think it is so clear how or why people make the choices that they do. In terms of right and wrong, the law identifies the act, but justice identifies with larger patterns; it is elusive yet tangible.