I have to agree with kovacs. Simply saying "No" does not count as a reasonable answer to a reasonable question (and I agree in the fact that it sounds petulant)

I have to agree with kovacs. Simply saying "No" does not count as a reasonable answer to a reasonable question (and I agree in the fact that it sounds petulant). If you disagree with the points put forth disemminate them and offer a rebuttal. Do you think that the presented cryptographic solution is one that is equivalent to money? if so why? I'm sure if I wanted to argue so I could think of some parallels or arguments to illustrate the point (possibly using the example of the current credit or financial systems, though I think I would personally disagree with those arguments). If not and you take exception to some other point raised state what that is. Your response as it is provides 1 bit of information and that is only as to your opinion on a matter and is thus semantically useless.