4 ms·
That's almost like saying the vast majority of exploits depend on you using a Turing machine. Breaking most websites for the sake of slightly reducing the atta
by lucian1900 13y ago
That's almost like saying the vast majority of exploits depend on you using a Turing machine.
Breaking most websites for the sake of slightly reducing the attack surface doesn't seem worth it.
- sentenza 13y agoYou have never been in the Russian-speaking part of the Internet, have you?
- userbinator 13y agoThe definition of "most websites" varies between people; the majority of the Internet browsing I do (mostly reading content in the form of text or images) does not require JS. If I come across a site in a search that refuses to show content without JS (and Google's cache, text-only, doesn't give me what I want to see either), I'll just move on to the next search result. It's far better for websites to break, than my machine. The tradeoff will be different for someone who regularly browses a different demographic of sites.