4 ms·
Aaron you come across so angry and prickly that even people that may agree with you do so begrudgingly. In this case you're simply wrong to not even agree and c
by kovacs 13y ago
Aaron you come across so angry and prickly that even people that may agree with you do so begrudgingly. In this case you're simply wrong to not even agree and cannot expound beyond a simple "No", like a 2 year old that doesn't want to share their drink box. The fact is he's right, there's nothing about bitcoin and the technology itself that should fall under scrutiny until it's used in monetary transactions. It's almost as if you didn't even read that questions because your answer is just flat wrong. I respect what you've done to disseminate the information regarding the complete failure of government to clarify and enforce laws around finance but you may want to reconsider your tone because it's not going to help you to further that cause.
- dcc1 13y agoHe's a legal troll a parasite on innovation not to different from patent trolls, don't entertain him.
- thinkcomp 13y agoYou have it backwards.
- hnnewguy 13y ago>because your answer is just flat wrong His answer to "Can we agree?" is wrong?
- thinkcomp 13y agoSo first of all, you have to keep in mind that I'm in the middle of litigation related to these issues. I am careful about what I say. Second of all, the question posed here was both presumptuous and awfully vague. I'm not about to go on the record in response to that kind of question other than to reject it. I'm sorry if that makes me come off as prickly--I have to put other considerations ahead of public perception.