4 ms·
I think the claim is based on the fact that if you ask any judge if you can search yourself, the answer is automatically yes, possibly followed up with "why are
by lawnchair_larry 13y ago
I think the claim is based on the fact that if you ask any judge if you can search yourself, the answer is automatically yes, possibly followed up with "why are you even here?"
So they're doing the next best thing by having a mock trial, where the answer isn't automatically "yes". They're in kind of a weird position here, but it doesn't seem like there is a better way to do it. IANAL obviously.
- 6cxs2hd6 13y agoI at least give them credit for responding so quickly to the online shitstorm -- and with what seems like a reasonable, specific plan.
- robszumski 13y agoWhy wouldn't they let the appropriate authorities know, have them conduct an investigation and get a legal search warrant? Especially if they want to charge the guy anyways. If they just wanted to know who he was, do the hush hush internal search and fire him.
- derefr 13y agoBreaking NDAs and leaking company secrets are civic, not criminal, breaches of law; they only exist insofar as the company is empowered to sue using them. There are no authorities who would be interested in investigating.