2 ms·
Well, "good" depends for who. The beneficiaries would be first-world population in one, and third world in the other. Besides, putting all eggs in a basket cou
by pizza234 13y ago
Well, "good" depends for who. The beneficiaries would be first-world population in one, and third world in the other.
Besides, putting all eggs in a basket could be a fitting metaphor, except if the person holding the basket has a perverse passion for stomping on it.
Moving to Mars wouldn't be a way to save the population, it would be an excuse to find another planet to destroy.
- UnFleshedOne 13y agoThere really is nothing to destroy on mars. You can't destroy an ecosystem where there is none.