4 ms·

I'm not sure why this is being upvoted. It's very light on technical content (how can you mention sqlite and not say that its type system is advisory only is be

I'm not sure why this is being upvoted. It's very light on technical content (how can you mention sqlite and not say that its type system is advisory only is beyond me), and provides no added value compared to what you can get out of a quick google search if you wanted to compare these three widely used RDBMS. I'll note that I usually disagree with these "why is this on HN" posts, but technical posts should have a higher bar than this.

BugBrother 13y ago
I believe that in any given month there are lots of really shocked blog authors moaning: "Why did HN vote up those notes to myself instead of when I wrote about something I know?!" 1/2 :-)
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
bsg75 13y ago
Are not "upvotes" are the only to save articles in HN, short of commenting? If this is correct, how many upvotes are people upvoting [1] vs saving for reference, or to read comments later - which for the latter I wish there was a save / bookmark in HN option. [1] ... and hopefully are not aware the content is sketchy