I'm sorry but every time I hear someone go "[a]gile is SOOOO diferent from [A]gile" I also hear that same person pushing the same agendas and doing following th

I'm sorry but every time I hear someone go "[a]gile is SOOOO diferent from [A]gile" I also hear that same person pushing the same agendas and doing following the same practices based on zero evidence for their efficacy. This whole "little-a vs big-A" is just another way for people to keep pushing the same thing they've been pushing to make money rather than admitting it's time to move on and admit Agile didn't work. Same as the "Scrum-but vs. Scrum" people and the evolving manifestos the Agile guys produce: http://agilemanifesto.org/ http://agilemanifesto.org/ http://jchyip.blogspot.com/2010/06/kent-becks-evolution-of-agile-manifesto.html http://jchyip.blogspot.com/2010/06/kent-becks-evolution-of-a... http://manifesto.softwarecraftsmanship.org/ http://manifesto.softwarecraftsmanship.org/ Just people trying to keep their agile consultancies afloat after screwing people over for years. Signed, Zed of http://programming-motherfucker.com/ http://programming-motherfucker.com/