3 ms·
Apologies that this is about form not substance: I appreciate the clarity of the "What makes Variance unique?" and "Where is Variance not a good fit?" sections
by glaugh 13y ago
Apologies that this is about form not substance:
I appreciate the clarity of the "What makes Variance unique?" and "Where is Variance not a good fit?" sections. Really useful.
As someone who makes a data analysis tool (with a bit of viz thrown in), that's probably something we could do better.
- lynaghk 13y agoNo apology necessary, as there isn't a useful distinction between "form" and "substance" here = ) My dev background is in the Clojure community, where Rich sets a strong tone about the importance of discussing tradeoffs. We outlined those tradeoffs explicitly on the site because that's always what's on the forefront of my mind when making a technical decision. I'm glad you found it helpful.
- anigbrowl 13y agoI came here to praise 'Where is Variance not a good fit?' as well. This is a great introduction, I wish everything had this level of detail on the landing page. I find it infuriating (everywhere from Unix command line to websites for new tools ) not to have a clear answer to the question of 'why you should/should not use this.'
- jwr 13y agoI also admire the upfront and clear explanation. For people who are about to make a decision this helps immensely. Everyone should learn from this: there is no point in overhyping or hiding things — I will discover these tradeoffs eventually anyway, so why not save everyone some time and clarify them upfront?
- gburnett 13y agoThe "Where is Variance not a good fit?" section is useful. I'm not just saying that as a long time victim/critic of pie charts.