Those numbers are for traditional VC only, whereas Cuban is talking about "capital". VC is a subset of capital sources. For example, that table says that only

Those numbers are for traditional VC only, whereas Cuban is talking about "capital". VC is a subset of capital sources. For example, that table says that only $453m was invested in businesses in LA in 2010. But ~$250m went into the Harry Potter film that was released the following year. Perhaps some definition of "capital" would not include this money, but then isn't the metric broken?