The above sentiment leans towards labeling any who dare possess a pocket constitution as potential terrorists, which is absurd. Yes, that's exactly the author'

The above sentiment leans towards labeling any who dare possess a pocket constitution as potential terrorists, which is absurd. Yes, that's exactly the author's point. Seriously, is the article supposed to be a joke? No, it's a criticism of Baker's point of view that the limits of intelligence can't be discussed because it would help those it's trying to surveil.