3 ms·
It's maddening and appalling to you because you deliberately disabled an essential part of the web platform on your browser. Your problem, not theirs.
by mantrax2 13y ago
It's maddening and appalling to you because you deliberately disabled an essential part of the web platform on your browser. Your problem, not theirs.
- jimktrains2 13y agoWhat about the blind who use screen readers or braille displays? Why should the page become so bloated that I can't read simple text simply?
- thatsar_ 13y agoI don't have first-hand experience, but my impression is that modern screen readers shouldn't have too much trouble with simple JavaScript like this. Could anybody with experience confirm/deny?
- TheHegemon 13y agoAccording to a recent podcast I listened to[1] about a blind Software user, it seemed like there is a lot of issues with the current generation of Screen Readers. This includes issues with JS. 1.http://hanselminutes.com/413/im-a-blind-software-technician-ask-me-anything-with-katherine-moss http://hanselminutes.com/413/im-a-blind-software-technician-...
- mendelk 13y agoThis is not an endorsement (or not) for blogs that rely on JS, but apparently 98.6% of screenreader users have javascript enabled.[0] [0] http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey4/ http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey4/
- jimktrains2 13y agoDoesn't mean that it's makes for a pleasant or useful experience. Viz http://hanselminutes.com/413/im-a-blind-software-technician-ask-me-anything-with-katherine-moss http://hanselminutes.com/413/im-a-blind-software-technician-... from a sibling comment of yours. Also, I'm surprised I got downvoted for saying that we should be considering the disabled when making decisions on how to structure a blog. I know accessibility isn't _cool_ but it's the right thing to do, especially for a text-based site, like a blog. (PS: mendelk, I'm not accusing you of downvoting me)