2 ms·

Source please. Also, statistically, do gun owners live in unsafer environments to begin with, hence the perceived need for ownership?

• forinti 17y ago
  This is a highly controversial article, I admit: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/329/15/1084 http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/329/15/1084 Gun ownership is widespread in the US, and lots of people have them in perfectly safe regions. So do they not create a source of danger where there was none? Accidents do happen. In my country, gun deaths went down considerably after the police started taking them out of circulation. As one police officer put it, bar fights became a lot less deadly in the suburbs.
  • TrevorJ 17y ago
    Thanks for the link. Yes, it is true that accidents happen, I'll give you that. The same can be said for cars, which kill far more people each year than handguns. I'm not arguing one way or the other here, just saying it is a difficult issue.
  • baddox 17y ago
    That gets into a different argument: should people be allowed to do things that don't have a demonstrable health or safety benefit for them? Should unhealthy foods be outlawed? Exercise mandated?