5 ms·
All I really need are client-side templates and awesome DOM binding. What's the current best options?
by ap22213 13y ago
All I really need are client-side templates and awesome DOM binding.
What's the current best options?
- dlsym 13y agoAngularJS.
- prottmann 13y agohttp://www.ractivejs.org/ http://www.ractivejs.org/
- egeozcan 13y agoRactive is my favorite. The community is not there though.
- awinder 13y agohttp://knockoutjs.com http://knockoutjs.com is probably a good contender as something primarily focused on templates and data bindings without much else.
- sergiotapia 13y agoBackbone.JS, it's exceptionally bare bones, but hey it's YOUR code. You don't have to memorize an entire framework like Angular. Pick up a Backbone book and in two weeks your dangerous enough to use it. A month, you're in the groove. 6 months: Angul-who?
- slimshady 13y agoAmen....
- GazNewt 13y agoExactly.
- mushishi 13y agoIf you are going to use Backbone for the first time in a big project, beware that you don't end up with low-level code that is duplicated in different flavours all over the place. When you have implemented features enough to notice that it takes too many steps to make new views that resemble old ones, ease off from feature building, and make proper custom abstractions suitable for that particular project. Also check out Backbone extension: Marionette for modularizing and backbone-documentmodel for non-linear forms.
- mcv 13y ago> Pick up a Backbone book and in two weeks your dangerous enough to use it. A month, you're in the groove. 6 months: Angul-who? Is this supposed to sell Backbone? Because I'm on a similar curve with Angular with just the online docs. Doing stuff in Angular is really unbelievably easy once you let go of your old preconceptions. It's a new way of thinking, but it's one that's very effective.
- duebbert 13y agohttp://www.rivetsjs.com/ http://www.rivetsjs.com/ I'm planning to use it in my next project but haven't yet. It seems to fit the bill nicely.