3 ms·
It does when it comes to not leaving your views in an ugly string representation of html - you use a build process of some sorts to get around that fundamental
by Bahamut 13y ago
It does when it comes to not leaving your views in an ugly string representation of html - you use a build process of some sorts to get around that fundamental flaw so that you can still use a nice html template file. That alone was enough to sour me on Backbone, hence the comparison.
This flaw in Angular isn't nearly as deep was my point.
- iLoch 13y agoHTML is HTML, why does it matter what file type it resides in? All my templates are stored according to the view's type within my ./templates folder. If I want to include the HTML in an "actual" HTML file I can do that too. Have you even used Backbone?