This is very cool and much better insight than the forbes article... I think it can still be summed up as "they angry" being the reason they take these cases.

This is very cool and much better insight than the forbes article... I think it can still be summed up as "they angry" being the reason they take these cases. >One of the key reasons the Supreme Court will take a case is when lower courts disagree on a legal issue. But, with patent law’s single appellate court, no such splits arise. This was the question that I think that I was trying to understand better, if there is no ambiguity of opinion from lower courts is the only reason they take patent cases because they just happen to disagree?