4 ms·
I would rewrite this blog post and use "Roy's" real name...he deserves to be shamed. Edit: I don't mind the downvotes, but as usual I appreciate any reasoning
by gavanwoolery 13y ago
I would rewrite this blog post and use "Roy's" real name...he deserves to be shamed.
Edit: I don't mind the downvotes, but as usual I appreciate any reasoning behind them...I don't think what I said was irrelevant? This guy is apparently dangerous and his real name should be exposed.
- sp332 13y agoDave's point was to avoid a lawsuit, not to attract one. The article is using a single incident to warn about a whole class of people. It's not just about one guy.
- gavanwoolery 13y agoAh I see - thanks. But shouldn't this guy's real name be used? He is clearly a scam artist if he joins a company, produces nothing, then sues over a completely valid firing...regardless of his age.
- sp332 13y agoPossibly, but that would probably lead to him suing Dave, which Dave already spent a lot of money to avoid!
- gavanwoolery 13y agoGood point again :)
- jotux 13y ago>he deserves to be shamed. You heard one side of a story about a contentious situation between two people and you want to publicly shame someone based on this? What if the older guy has a completely different story that explains why he had trouble working there? Just don't dox people -- and if you really think it's necessary to try to publicly shame someone make sure you have truly irrefutable evidence to back you up.
- gavanwoolery 13y agoAlso a good point - thanks I did not really think of that -- just a gut reaction to lawsuits. That said, if this guy really did what he did, I hope that real justice eventually prevails.
- shill 13y agoThis happened 29 years ago.